Unit 4 Topics 3 and 4 (journeys + scheduling half) · both of his "not sure where to start" flags live here · week 3 of the internal run
The concept in one sentence: Euler walks every LINE exactly once, Hamiltonian visits every DOT exactly once, and a critical path is the longest chain of waiting in a project, which is what sets the earliest possible finish.
The thing that makes it click: for the journeys, the mantra (edges vs vertices). For critical path, the dinner analogy: dinner is ready when the SLOWEST dish is ready, no matter how fast the salad was.
1 · Prerequisite check (30 seconds)
Degree of a vertex from a picture (he has it), and "odd or even?" on a handful of numbers. For critical path: can he read an activity table row as a sentence ("C takes 3 weeks and can't start until A is done")?
If the table-reading fails, that is the actual gap, not the maths. Practise translating rows to sentences before drawing anything.
2 · The teaching path
Journeys first (Euler → Hamiltonian):
Concrete: the garbage truck (must drive every STREET) vs the sales rep (must visit every TOWN). Ask which is which before defining anything, he'll get it, and now the mantra is his idea
The rule, discovered not told: draw three small graphs (all even; two odd; four odd). He tries to trace each without lifting the pen. Then count odd vertices together. The 0-or-2 rule lands as a discovery
Notation: trail (different ends, exactly 2 odd) vs circuit (same ends, 0 odd). Trail must START and END at the odd pair, "the odd ones are the loose ends". QCAA's nouns, say them until they're old friends: a graph WITH an Euler trail is semi-Eulerian, with a circuit it's Eulerian; visit-every-vertex versions are semi-Hamiltonian (path) and Hamiltonian (cycle)
Critical path second (his teach-from-scratch flag, go slow):
Concrete: making dinner. Lasagne 90 min, salad 10 min, table 5 min. When do we eat? Why doesn't hurrying the salad help? That IS float and the critical path, before any diagram
Picture: the activity table → network drawn ACTIVITY-ON-ARC, the QCAA way: activities ride the ARROWS with their durations written on them, and the circles are just events (moments where arrows meet). He draws, you dictate rows as sentences. Boxes-with-durations-inside is a different convention and the exam's diagram won't look like it
Entry method: list every start-to-finish path, add each up, LONGEST = minimum completion time. Path-listing is the concrete way in, the graphs are small enough
Then the named method, because exam questions use these words: FORWARD scanning (left to right) gives every activity's EST, the earliest start time given what it waits for. BACKWARD scanning (right to left) gives the LST, the latest start that doesn't delay the finish. Float = LST − EST. Critical activities are the ones where float = 0. A question that says "use forward scanning" or asks for one activity's EST must be answerable in this vocabulary, path-listing alone can't do it
Float with numbers: "E starts at week 7 because it waits for C. B finished at 5. So B could slip 2." Always a sentence with two numbers in it
Euler = every EDGE once (0 or 2 odd) · Hamiltonian = every VERTEX once (no rule, hunt) · critical path = LONGEST path
Streets or towns? Lines or dots?
Which dish is the lasagne here?
3 · Misconception catalogue (⭐ = seen in his diagnostic)
Looks like
Why brains do it
The fix script
⭐ Critical path = shortest path
"Critical" and "efficient" both sound like minimising
The dinner table: "the SHORT path is the salad. Does dinner arrive when the salad's done?" Then: longest chain of waiting sets the finish
⭐ Mixes up which tool schedules a project
Tool blur across the topic
Same which-tool matching drill as week 2, now with critical path as a live option
Euler rule misremembered (thinks 1 odd vertex is fine)
Rules memorised without the why
Back to pen-tracing: every time you pass THROUGH a vertex you use 2 of its edges, so odd degrees only survive at the two ends. 1 odd vertex is actually impossible (handshaking)
Hunts for a Hamiltonian degree rule
Euler had one, so this should too
"Euler is the tidy twin. Hamiltonian you hunt by inspection, that's why exam graphs stay small"
Float = the activity's duration
Both are "time attached to a task"
"Float is the slack, not the size. How late can it run before anyone downstream notices?"
Justifies float with vibes ("B seems less important")
Doesn't know a justification needs numbers
The two-number sentence frame: "___ starts at week ___, ___ finishes at week ___, so the float is ___"
Tries Euler's formula v + f − e = 2 on a trail question
Two different things are named Euler, and one is printed in the book
"Euler's FORMULA is about flat drawings and faces, and it lives in the book. The Euler TRAIL rule (0 or 2 odds) lives in your head." Name the collision before the exam does
Leaves float blank for a critical activity
"There's nothing to calculate"
"Zero IS the answer, write it. Float = 0 is the finding, and saying it earns the mark"
4 · Questioning ladder
Rung
Ask
Listen for
Recall
"Euler trail needs how many odd vertices?"
"0 or 2", fast
Do
The park ranger (P, Q, R, S with 5 paths of 3 km): possible? route? distance?
Counts degrees FIRST, finds odd pair Q and R, routes between them, 15 km
Explain back
"Why must the walk start and end at the odd vertices?"
Some version of "passing through uses edges in pairs, the odd ones are the loose ends"
Transfer
The A6 B4 C3 D2 E2 activity table: minimum time, who can slip, by how much
Lists paths (11 vs 8), names A-C-E critical, gives B and D 3 weeks WITH the two-number sentence
5 · How QCAA examines it
Euler: "determine an Euler trail... EXPLAIN your reasoning" (Q8a). The reasoning mark = stating the odd-vertex rule and showing the degree count. The route alone is not full marks
Hamiltonian: usually welded to a time calculation (walk speed + minutes per stop → latest start time). The maths is easy, the marks are in organising it: distance → walking time → add the stops → subtract from the deadline
Critical path: "construct a project network" (SF) then "determine any activities that could be delayed... JUSTIFY using mathematical reasoning" (CF). Justify = the two-number sentence, every activity they ask about
Trap wording: "minimum completion time" comes from the LONGEST path. The examiners know exactly which wrong instinct they're fishing for
6 · Stuck scripts
Count the odd dots first. Then decide.
Lines or dots, which one does this question care about?
List every path start to finish. Add each one up. Which is the lasagne?
When can E actually start? When did B actually finish? The gap is the float.
7 · ADHD delivery notes
Pen-tracing Euler routes is tactile and quick, use it as the energiser mid-session
Critical path was a "not sure where to start" flag: start it in a week when he arrives fresh, not after 40 minutes of finance
The dinner analogy sticks better if it's HIS dinner: ask what he'd cook, build the table from that
Path-listing is systematic and calming (no cleverness needed): frame it as "boring wins marks here"